unionklion.blogg.se

Sourcetree update
Sourcetree update















NOTE: Setting showUntrackedFiles property to no on your repo's git config file will mean when you add a new file it won't be picked up by git status unless you explicitly run it with -uall param. The Sourcetree.exe is actually a wrapper to the real. inside localappdata/Sourcetree there should be a Sourcetree.exe and a versioned folder like app-3.0.17. More info can be found here (under status.showUntrackedFiles section):Īnd here (under -untracked-files section): Sourcetree, the application, installs in the to localappdata/Sourcetree folder, its configuration files go in localappdata/Atlassian/Sourcetree. The problem then becomes SourceTree refuses to respect this flag (while other tools like Tower do respect it). Difference Between GitHub Desktop and Sourcetree There are several tools that can be used to manage Git repositories. There is a way to configure your git config file to always skip searching for untracked files when running git status via: git config -local status.showUntrackedFiles no Sourcetree always uses -uall when doing status refreshes. At the time sourcetree suggested updating to 3.4.10 but that version wasnt actually released so it messed up the installation. If you find git status -uall is super slow (same slowness as SourceTree then this is likely your culprit). You can test issue in command line: git status -uall Investigated and found root cause of SourceTree slowness. Had this issue with large repository (has many files). Microsoft has a solution for improving repo performance: Scalar Option 3: (Use Tower/CLI and With Scalar). Option 2: (Use Tower/CLI and set showUntrackedFiles)

Sourcetree update update#

The one issue I faced while using sourcetree is whenever you update your git password. (On macOS) From the left-side menu, hover your mouse over the right side of the Branches label until you see the word Show. SourceTree simplifies how you interact with your Git and Mercurial. (For me I had to set it back and forth once to take effect). Sourcetree Get started Work using Git Merge changes from one branch to another (Git) If a feature branch is behind master, you can sync that branch, using a merge, into your feature branch. Can be turned off by setting filter to "Modified".

sourcetree update

That might not be an exhaustive list but they are the type of reasons that can legitimately lead to this state.SourceTree does long thorough refresh. The second is to pull down the Repository menu and select Interactive rebase.

The first is to right-click (or context-click) on a commit and choose Rebase children of interactively.

In the meantime, there have also been updates to Sourcetree and Im currently using 2.3.1 for which editing/removing the LOCALAPPDATAAtlassianSourceTreepasswd file works (2.0. Subsequent fetches from the Project A repo would then start to see them again. There are two ways to start an interactive rebase in Sourcetree. I am using Sourcetree 2.0.18.1 Update I have been circumventing this problem by using key based authentication through pageant. This would be allowed since those branches and commits don’t clash with the contents of the remote or Project A. Somewhere along the line if Project B still had references to those branches and an accidental push was done from it, it could reinstate them.

  • As the repo’s are copies of eachother, even if they end up with different contents, it is possible to push from both - just as if you were 2 developers on 2 machines pushing to the same remote repo.
  • Delete 'C:UsersAppDataLocalAtlassianSourceTree passwd '.

    Manually delete all credentials in Sourcetree ( Tools -> Options -> Authentication).

  • Systems like GitHub offer the ability to “undo” the deleting of a branch on its side, which would reinstate it and make it appear on a subsequent fetch. Make sure the name you give it is entirely lowercase (When I did these steps, they didnt work until I did this).
  • They just disappeared visually rather than actually through options like the “Show Remote Branches” checkbox at the top of the screenshot.
  • Something went wrong when deleting the branches from source tree and it may have appeared to show them gone temporarily but they still existed on the remote and could return on a future successful fetch.
  • Easily utilize both distributed version control systems from one application.

    sourcetree update

    I can only make guesses as to why they returned, those guesses would include: SourceTree is a fast and easy way to work with Git and Mercurial. Yeah and I didn’t mean to appear condescending or anything either just that future you will realize it will be easy too.















    Sourcetree update